Communicative Competence in English: A Comprehensive Guide
Updated on July 7th, 2024
Introduction
Overview of Communicative Competence
Communicative competence is an essential component in mastering the English language, particularly for learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). Unlike traditional methods that focus primarily on grammatical accuracy, communicative competence encompasses a broader spectrum of language use. It involves not only the correct application of grammar and vocabulary but also the ability to use language effectively and appropriately in various social contexts. This holistic approach to language learning is crucial in today’s globalized world, where effective communication in English can significantly enhance personal, academic, and professional opportunities.
At its core, communicative competence integrates several key components. These include linguistic competence, which pertains to the knowledge of syntax, morphology, and vocabulary; sociolinguistic competence, which involves understanding how to use and respond to language appropriately according to social norms; discourse competence, which refers to the ability to produce coherent and cohesive spoken and written texts; and strategic competence, which encompasses the skills needed to overcome communication barriers and ensure the effective conveyance of messages. Mastering these components enables individuals to navigate diverse communication scenarios with confidence and fluency.
Purpose of the Article
The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive guide to developing communicative competence in English. It is designed to serve as a valuable resource for English teachers and professionals in the field of English teaching and learning, as well as for students and non-professionals who aspire to enhance their communicative skills. By delving into the various dimensions of communicative competence and offering practical strategies and exercises, this guide aims to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application.
Through this article, readers will gain insights into the importance of communicative competence in language learning, understand the components that constitute communicative competence, and discover effective methods to develop each aspect. The ultimate goal is to equip learners and educators with the tools needed to foster an environment where effective communication in English can flourish. Whether you are an educator seeking to enrich your teaching methods or a learner aiming to improve your communication skills, this guide will provide the necessary knowledge and practical tips to achieve communicative competence in English.
Understanding Communicative Competence
Definition and Components of Communicative Competence
Communicative competence is the ability to use language effectively and appropriately in various contexts. This concept goes beyond the mere knowledge of grammatical rules and vocabulary; it encompasses the pragmatic use of language to convey and interpret messages successfully. The term was first introduced by Dell Hymes as a counterpoint to Noam Chomsky’s notion of linguistic competence, which focused solely on syntactic knowledge (Hymes, 1972). Communicative competence integrates four main components: linguistic competence, sociolinguistic competence, discourse competence, and strategic competence.
Linguistic Competence
Linguistic competence refers to the mastery of the language system, including knowledge of syntax, morphology, phonology, and vocabulary. It involves understanding how to construct grammatically correct sentences and the rules that govern sentence structure. For EFL/ESL learners, developing linguistic competence is foundational, as it provides the necessary tools to form meaningful utterances. Techniques for enhancing linguistic competence include extensive reading, vocabulary-building exercises, and grammar drills (Richards & Schmidt, 2010). However, linguistic competence alone is insufficient for effective communication, as it does not account for the appropriateness of language use in different social contexts.
Sociolinguistic Competence
Sociolinguistic competence involves the ability to use language appropriately in various social contexts. This component addresses the sociocultural norms and conventions that govern language use, such as politeness, formality, and context-specific expressions. For instance, the way one speaks in a formal business meeting differs significantly from a casual conversation with friends. Sociolinguistic competence enables learners to navigate these differences effectively. Role-playing and simulations are practical methods to develop sociolinguistic competence, as they allow learners to practice language use in diverse scenarios (Canale & Swain, 1980).
Discourse Competence
Discourse competence pertains to the ability to produce coherent and cohesive texts, both spoken and written. It involves understanding how to organize sentences and ideas logically to create meaningful and fluid communication. Key aspects of discourse competence include the use of cohesive devices like conjunctions, pronouns, and transition words, as well as the ability to maintain a consistent theme and structure throughout the discourse (Brown, 2007). Activities such as writing essays, participating in debates, and engaging in storytelling can significantly enhance discourse competence.
Strategic Competence
Strategic competence is the ability to recognize and repair communication breakdowns. It involves using strategies such as paraphrasing, asking for clarification, and using non-verbal cues to ensure the message is conveyed accurately despite any obstacles. Strategic competence is crucial for maintaining effective communication, particularly when learners encounter unfamiliar vocabulary or complex sentence structures. Teaching learners to employ communication strategies proactively can help them become more resilient and adaptable speakers (Bachman & Palmer, 1996).
Importance in Language Learning
Understanding and developing communicative competence is vital in language learning as it equips learners with the skills necessary for real-life communication. Unlike traditional language instruction that may focus predominantly on grammatical accuracy, a communicative approach prepares learners to use language flexibly and appropriately in varied contexts. This holistic perspective on language learning aligns with the needs of global communication, where the ability to interact effectively across different cultures and settings is increasingly important (Savignon, 2002).
Moreover, communicative competence fosters greater learner autonomy and confidence. As learners become proficient in using language in practical situations, they are more likely to engage in spontaneous conversations and take risks in their language use. This engagement not only enhances language proficiency but also promotes a positive attitude toward language learning (Larsen-Freeman, 2000). By integrating the components of communicative competence into language instruction, educators can create a more dynamic and effective learning environment.
Developing Linguistic Competence
Linguistic competence is a fundamental aspect of communicative competence, encompassing the mastery of grammar, vocabulary, phonological skills, and various techniques to enhance these elements. Developing linguistic competence is crucial for EFL/ESL learners as it forms the backbone of effective communication in English.
Mastery of Grammar and Vocabulary
Grammar and vocabulary are the building blocks of any language. Mastery in these areas allows learners to construct accurate and meaningful sentences, thereby facilitating clear and effective communication. Grammar involves the rules governing the structure of sentences, including syntax, morphology, and punctuation. A solid understanding of grammar helps learners avoid common errors and express themselves more precisely (Ellis, 2006).
Vocabulary, on the other hand, is the set of words known and used by a person. A rich vocabulary enables learners to understand and produce a wide range of texts and conversations. Effective vocabulary acquisition strategies include direct instruction, extensive reading, and the use of vocabulary notebooks. Learning new words in context, rather than in isolation, helps learners remember and use them more effectively (Nation, 2001).
Phonological Skills
Phonological skills refer to the ability to recognize and produce the sounds of a language. This includes understanding phonemes (the smallest units of sound), stress patterns, intonation, and rhythm. Developing phonological skills is essential for accurate pronunciation, which in turn affects comprehensibility. Poor pronunciation can lead to misunderstandings, even if the grammatical and lexical aspects of a message are correct (Celce-Murcia, Brinton, & Goodwin, 2010).
Phonological awareness can be enhanced through various techniques such as minimal pair exercises, where learners practice distinguishing between similar sounds (e.g., ship and sheep). Additionally, engaging in shadowing exercises, where learners repeat sentences after a model speaker, can improve intonation and stress patterns. Listening to and imitating native speakers also helps in developing a more natural accent (Gilakjani, 2016).
Techniques for Improving Linguistic Competence
Improving linguistic competence requires consistent practice and the use of effective techniques. Here are some strategies that can help learners enhance their grammar, vocabulary, and phonological skills:
- Interactive Grammar Activities: Utilizing interactive grammar exercises, such as fill-in-the-blank activities, sentence reordering, and grammar games, makes learning more engaging and effective. These activities can be integrated into classroom instruction or practiced independently using online resources.
- Extensive Reading and Writing: Encouraging learners to read extensively exposes them to different grammatical structures and vocabulary in context. Writing regularly, whether through journaling, essays, or creative writing, helps reinforce grammatical rules and vocabulary usage. Providing feedback on written work is crucial for learners to identify and correct errors (Grabe & Stoller, 2011).
- Phonetic Training: Incorporating phonetic training into language lessons helps learners understand the sounds of English more deeply. This can include exercises focusing on specific phonemes, stress patterns, and intonation. Using tools like the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) can aid in teaching correct pronunciation (Underhill, 2005).
- Language Games and Activities: Games like Scrabble, word searches, and crossword puzzles are enjoyable ways to build vocabulary. Role-playing and simulations can also provide practical contexts for using new words and grammar structures, enhancing both linguistic competence and confidence (Wright, Betteridge, & Buckby, 2006).
- Technology and Language Apps: Leveraging technology, such as language learning apps (e.g., Duolingo, Babbel), can provide learners with additional practice outside the classroom. These apps often use gamification to motivate learners and offer personalized feedback to improve specific areas of weakness (Godwin-Jones, 2011).
In conclusion, developing linguistic competence involves a comprehensive approach that includes mastering grammar and vocabulary, honing phonological skills, and employing various techniques to reinforce these elements. Consistent practice, effective use of technology, and interactive learning activities are key to enhancing linguistic competence in EFL/ESL learners.
Enhancing Sociolinguistic Competence
Sociolinguistic competence is a crucial aspect of communicative competence, encompassing the ability to use language appropriately in various social contexts and understand cultural nuances. Developing sociolinguistic competence enables EFL/ESL learners to communicate effectively and respectfully across different social settings and cultural backgrounds.
Understanding Social Contexts and Cultural Nuances
To communicate effectively, learners must understand the social and cultural contexts in which language is used. This includes recognizing the roles of participants in a conversation, the setting, and the purpose of the interaction. For instance, the language used in a formal business meeting differs significantly from that used in a casual conversation with friends. Understanding these differences helps learners choose appropriate language forms and expressions (Hymes, 1972).
Cultural nuances play a significant role in communication. Each culture has its own set of norms, values, and expectations that influence how language is used. For example, in some cultures, directness is valued and seen as a sign of honesty, while in others, indirectness is preferred to maintain harmony and avoid confrontation. EFL/ESL learners must be aware of these cultural differences to avoid misunderstandings and communicate effectively (Byram, 1997).
One effective way to develop an understanding of social contexts and cultural nuances is through exposure to authentic language use. This can be achieved by interacting with native speakers, watching films and television shows, and reading books and articles that reflect the target culture. These activities provide learners with real-life examples of how language is used in different social and cultural contexts (Kramsch, 1993).
Appropriate Use of Language in Different Settings
Using language appropriately in different settings requires learners to adjust their speech according to the context. This involves selecting the right level of formality, choosing appropriate vocabulary, and using suitable grammatical structures. For instance, the way one addresses a superior at work will differ from how they talk to a close friend.
Politeness strategies are an essential aspect of sociolinguistic competence. These strategies help speakers show respect, avoid offending others, and maintain positive social relationships. Politeness can be expressed through various linguistic means, such as using indirect language, modals (could, would), and softening expressions (perhaps, maybe) (Brown & Levinson, 1987).
Teaching learners how to use language appropriately in different settings can be done through explicit instruction and practice. Teachers can present scenarios that require different levels of formality and politeness and ask learners to role-play these situations. Discussing the linguistic and cultural aspects of these scenarios helps learners understand the expectations and norms associated with each context (Thomas, 1983).
Role-Playing and Simulations
Role-playing and simulations are effective techniques for enhancing sociolinguistic competence. These activities allow learners to practice using language in various social contexts and receive immediate feedback on their performance. Role-playing involves learners taking on specific roles and acting out scenarios, such as ordering food in a restaurant, participating in a job interview, or resolving a conflict.
Simulations are more elaborate than role-plays and often involve a series of interconnected activities that mimic real-life situations. For example, a simulation might involve learners planning a business trip, attending meetings, and negotiating deals. These activities provide learners with opportunities to use language authentically and develop their sociolinguistic competence (Ladousse, 1987).
When conducting role-plays and simulations, it is essential to create a supportive and non-threatening environment. Learners should feel comfortable experimenting with language and making mistakes. Providing clear instructions and objectives for each activity ensures that learners understand the context and purpose of their interactions (Livingstone, 1983).
Feedback is crucial in these activities. Teachers should provide constructive feedback on learners’ language use, highlighting areas of strength and suggesting improvements. Peer feedback can also be valuable, as it allows learners to reflect on their performance and learn from each other’s experiences (Richards & Rodgers, 2014).
Building Discourse Competence
Discourse competence involves the ability to construct coherent and cohesive spoken and written texts. It enables learners to connect sentences and ideas in a way that is logical and easy to follow. Developing discourse competence is essential for effective communication, as it ensures that messages are conveyed clearly and comprehensively.
Coherence and Cohesion in Spoken and Written Texts
Coherence and cohesion are fundamental aspects of discourse competence. Coherence refers to the logical flow of ideas in a text, making it easy for the reader or listener to understand the overall message. Cohesion, on the other hand, refers to the grammatical and lexical links that connect sentences and ideas within a text.
Achieving coherence in spoken and written texts involves organizing ideas logically and ensuring that each part of the text contributes to the overall message. For example, in a well-structured essay, each paragraph should focus on a single main idea that supports the thesis statement. In conversations, coherence can be maintained by sticking to the topic and using appropriate transitions between different points (Halliday & Hasan, 1976).
Cohesion is achieved through the use of cohesive devices such as conjunctions, pronouns, and lexical repetition. Conjunctions (e.g., and, but, because) link clauses and sentences, indicating relationships between ideas. Pronouns (e.g., he, she, it) refer back to previously mentioned nouns, avoiding repetition. Lexical repetition and synonyms also help to maintain cohesion by reinforcing key ideas and ensuring that the text remains focused (Celce-Murcia & Larsen-Freeman, 1999).
Structuring Conversations and Texts
Effective structuring of conversations and texts is crucial for developing discourse competence. In spoken discourse, structuring conversations involves using conversational markers and turn-taking strategies to manage the flow of interaction. Conversational markers such as “well,” “so,” and “you know” help to signal transitions, emphasize points, and manage the direction of the conversation (Schiffrin, 1987).
Turn-taking strategies ensure that conversations are smooth and collaborative. These strategies include using pauses, intonation, and body language to indicate when a speaker has finished their turn and when it is appropriate for the next person to speak. Understanding these cues is essential for maintaining the flow of conversation and avoiding interruptions (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974).
In written texts, structuring involves organizing content into clear and logical sections. This includes writing effective introductions that outline the main points, developing body paragraphs that explore these points in detail, and concluding with a summary that reinforces the overall message. Using headings and subheadings can help to organize content and make the text more accessible to readers (Swales & Feak, 2012).
Practicing Through Dialogues and Writing Exercises
Practicing discourse competence through dialogues and writing exercises is an effective way to develop these skills. Dialogues provide learners with opportunities to practice structuring conversations, using cohesive devices, and maintaining coherence in real-time interactions. Writing exercises help learners to organize their ideas, use appropriate cohesive devices, and create coherent texts.
Role-playing dialogues based on real-life scenarios, such as ordering food at a restaurant or discussing a project with colleagues, can help learners practice discourse competence in a controlled setting. These activities encourage learners to use conversational markers, manage turn-taking, and maintain coherence in their interactions (Lazaraton, 2001).
Writing exercises such as essay writing, summarizing, and creating outlines are valuable for developing discourse competence in written texts. These exercises require learners to organize their ideas logically, use cohesive devices, and ensure that their writing is coherent and easy to follow. Providing feedback on these exercises helps learners identify areas for improvement and refine their discourse skills (Hyland, 2003).
Incorporating peer review sessions into writing exercises can also be beneficial. Peer review allows learners to receive constructive feedback from their peers, gain new perspectives on their writing, and learn from each other’s strengths and weaknesses. This collaborative approach fosters a deeper understanding of discourse competence and helps learners develop their skills more effectively (Rollinson, 2005).
Strategies for Developing Strategic Competence
Strategic competence is a critical aspect of communicative competence, encompassing the ability to use strategies to overcome communication difficulties. This involves problem-solving in communication, using paraphrasing and clarification, and effectively handling communication breakdowns. These strategies are essential for EFL/ESL learners to navigate real-life conversations successfully.
Problem-Solving in Communication
Problem-solving in communication involves recognizing and addressing barriers that impede effective interaction. EFL/ESL learners often encounter situations where they lack the vocabulary or grammatical structures to express themselves clearly. In such cases, strategic competence allows them to use alternative methods to convey their message.
One effective problem-solving strategy is the use of circumlocution, where learners describe a concept or object when they cannot recall the exact word. For example, if a learner forgets the word “refrigerator,” they might say “the place where you keep food cold.” This not only keeps the conversation flowing but also helps learners practice using the language creatively (Dörnyei & Scott, 1997).
Another strategy is using non-verbal cues such as gestures, facial expressions, and body language to supplement verbal communication. Non-verbal communication can provide context and enhance understanding, especially when learners struggle with specific words or phrases. For instance, pointing to an object or miming an action can clarify meaning and aid comprehension (Knapp, Hall, & Horgan, 2013).
Using Paraphrasing and Clarification
Paraphrasing and clarification are vital strategies for ensuring mutual understanding in communication. Paraphrasing involves restating the speaker’s message in different words, which helps confirm that the listener has correctly interpreted the information. It also allows the speaker to provide additional details or corrections if necessary.
For example, if a speaker says, “I’m planning to visit my relatives this weekend,” the listener might paraphrase it as, “So, you’re going to see your family on Saturday and Sunday?” This confirms the listener’s understanding and gives the speaker a chance to elaborate or clarify their plans (Richards & Schmidt, 2013).
Clarification strategies involve asking for repetition, explanations, or examples when a message is unclear. Learners can use phrases like “Could you repeat that?” or “Can you explain what you mean by…?” to seek further information. This not only helps resolve misunderstandings but also encourages active engagement and promotes effective communication (Gass & Varonis, 1985).
Handling Communication Breakdowns
Communication breakdowns are inevitable in any language learning process. They occur when the message is not understood as intended, leading to confusion or misinterpretation. Developing strategic competence involves learning how to handle these breakdowns effectively to maintain the flow of conversation.
One approach to handling communication breakdowns is using repair strategies. These strategies include self-repair, where the speaker corrects their own mistakes, and other-repair, where the listener helps the speaker correct an error. For instance, if a learner says, “I goed to the store,” they might self-repair by saying, “I mean, I went to the store.” Alternatively, a listener might assist by saying, “Do you mean ‘went’?” (Schegloff, Jefferson, & Sacks, 1977).
Another essential strategy is the use of confirmation checks and comprehension checks. Confirmation checks involve the speaker seeking confirmation from the listener that their message has been understood correctly. For example, “Did you get what I mean?” or “Is that clear?” Comprehension checks involve the listener ensuring they have understood the message, such as, “Do you mean…?” or “Is this what you’re saying?” These strategies help identify and resolve misunderstandings promptly (Long, 1983).
Additionally, simplifying language can be an effective way to handle communication breakdowns. When a learner realizes that their message is not being understood, they can rephrase it using simpler vocabulary and sentence structures. This reduces the cognitive load on both the speaker and listener, facilitating clearer communication (Tarone & Yule, 1989).
Integrating Communicative Competence in the Classroom
Developing communicative competence in EFL/ESL learners requires a practical, interactive approach in the classroom. Educators play a crucial role in designing and implementing activities that promote the four components of communicative competence: linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic. This section explores effective strategies and activities that can be incorporated into classroom teaching to enhance students’ communicative abilities.
Practical Activities and Exercises
To foster communicative competence, teachers should incorporate a variety of activities that encourage the active use of language. These activities should be designed to simulate real-life communication scenarios, thus providing learners with the opportunity to practice and refine their skills in a supportive environment.
Role-Plays and Simulations
Role-plays and simulations are highly effective for practicing sociolinguistic and strategic competencies. These activities allow students to act out different social situations, helping them understand cultural nuances and appropriate language use in various contexts. For example, students might role-play a job interview, a customer service interaction, or a social gathering. This kind of practice helps them develop the ability to navigate different social settings and use language strategically to achieve their communicative goals (Livingstone, 1983).
Information Gap Activities
Information gap activities involve two or more students who each have different pieces of information that must be shared to complete a task. This type of activity encourages students to ask questions, give explanations, and use clarification strategies, thereby practicing both linguistic and strategic competencies. For instance, one student might have a map with certain locations marked, while another has a list of directions. They must communicate effectively to match the locations with the directions (Harmer, 2015).
Storytelling and Narratives
Storytelling activities help enhance discourse competence by encouraging students to structure their thoughts coherently and use appropriate linking words and phrases. Students can be asked to tell a story from their own life, create a fictional story, or retell a story they have heard. This exercise helps them practice organizing their ideas and using language to convey a narrative clearly and engagingly (Wilson, 2002).
Group Discussions
Group discussions are a dynamic way to develop students’ communicative competence. These discussions can be centered around various topics relevant to the students’ interests or current events, encouraging them to express their opinions, agree or disagree with others, and build on their peers’ contributions.
Structured Discussions
Structured discussions involve guiding students through a conversation with a specific framework or set of rules. For example, a teacher might provide discussion questions in advance and assign roles such as moderator, timekeeper, or note-taker. This structure helps students stay focused and ensures that everyone has a chance to participate. It also helps students practice taking turns, listening actively, and responding appropriately (Brookfield & Preskill, 2012).
Fishbowl Discussions
In a fishbowl discussion, a small group of students discusses a topic in the center of the room while the rest of the class observes. After a set time, the observers provide feedback or ask questions, and then a new group takes a turn in the fishbowl. This method promotes active listening, and critical thinking, and provides an opportunity for all students to engage in the discussion, either as participants or observers (Kagan, 1994).
Debates and Presentations
Debates and presentations are excellent for developing both linguistic and strategic competencies. These activities require students to prepare and organize their thoughts, use persuasive language, and respond to questions or counterarguments.
Debates
Debates encourage students to research a topic, form an argument, and present it convincingly. They must also listen to opposing viewpoints and develop counterarguments. This helps students practice critical thinking, persuasive language, and effective communication strategies. Teachers can assign debate topics relevant to the course material or current events to keep the discussions engaging and educational (Snider & Schnurer, 2002).
Presentations
Presentations require students to organize their ideas logically, use visual aids, and speak clearly and confidently. This activity helps students practice structuring their speech, using appropriate vocabulary and grammar, and managing public speaking anxiety. Teachers can provide guidelines and rubrics to help students prepare and deliver effective presentations (King, 2002).
Teacher’s Role in Fostering Competence
Teachers play a pivotal role in fostering communicative competence by creating a supportive classroom environment and providing constructive feedback. They must model effective communication strategies, encourage student participation, and design activities that challenge students to use the language authentically.
Creating a Supportive Environment
A supportive classroom environment encourages risk-taking and reduces anxiety, making it easier for students to practice new language skills. Teachers should foster a culture of respect and inclusivity, where mistakes are seen as learning opportunities rather than failures. This positive atmosphere helps build students’ confidence and motivation to communicate (Dörnyei, 2001).
Providing Feedback
Constructive feedback is essential for helping students improve their communicative competence. Teachers should provide specific, actionable feedback on students’ language use, focusing on both strengths and areas for improvement. This feedback can be given during or after activities, in both oral and written forms. Regular feedback helps students understand their progress and identify strategies for further development (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).
Incorporating Technology
Integrating technology in the classroom can enhance communicative competence by providing diverse and interactive learning experiences. Tools such as language learning apps, online discussion forums, and digital storytelling platforms offer additional opportunities for practice and engagement. Teachers should leverage these tools to complement traditional classroom activities and provide students with a well-rounded language-learning experience (Blake, 2013).
Conclusion
In this comprehensive guide, we have explored the multifaceted concept of communicative competence in English, emphasizing its critical importance for EFL/ESL learners. Communicative competence extends beyond mere language proficiency to include the ability to effectively convey and interpret messages in diverse contexts. It encompasses linguistic competence, sociolinguistic competence, discourse competence, and strategic competence, each playing a vital role in achieving effective communication.
Developing linguistic competence involves mastering grammar, vocabulary, and phonological skills. These foundational elements are crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful sentences. Enhancing sociolinguistic competence requires an understanding of social contexts and cultural nuances, ensuring that language use is appropriate in various settings. Activities such as role-playing and simulations are effective in this regard.
Building discourse competence focuses on creating coherent and cohesive spoken and written texts. Structuring conversations and texts logically, practicing through dialogues and writing exercises, and understanding the flow of communication are essential for maintaining clarity and engagement. Strategic competence, on the other hand, involves problem-solving in communication, using techniques like paraphrasing, clarification, and handling communication breakdowns effectively.
Integrating these components into classroom teaching is paramount. Practical activities such as group discussions, debates, and presentations foster a dynamic learning environment where students can apply their skills in real-life scenarios. The teacher’s role in creating a supportive environment, providing constructive feedback, and incorporating technology cannot be overstated. These strategies help students build confidence and improve their communicative abilities.
In conclusion, communicative competence in English is an ongoing journey that requires dedication and continuous practice. EFL/ESL learners must actively engage in various activities and seek opportunities to apply their skills in different contexts. By embracing the strategies outlined in this guide, learners can enhance their communicative competence and achieve greater confidence and success in both personal and professional interactions. The pursuit of communicative competence is a lifelong endeavor, and with persistence and the right resources, learners can significantly improve their ability to communicate effectively in English.
References
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford University Press.
Bailey, K. M. (2003). Speaking. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English Language Teaching (pp. 47-66). McGraw-Hill.
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Chandler, D. (2003). Semiotics: The Basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173-210.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.
Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 149-161). Newbury House.
Gilakjani, A. P. (2016). English pronunciation instruction: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 1-6.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and Researching Reading. Pearson Education.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp. 269-293). Penguin.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. Kagan Publishing.
King, J. (2002). Preparing EFL learners for oral presentations. Journal of Humanistic and Social Sciences, 11(2), 47-59.
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role Play. Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lazaraton, A. (2001). Teaching oral skills. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed., pp. 103-115). Heinle & Heinle.
Livingstone, C. (1983). Role Play in Language Learning. Longman.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126-141.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). Longman.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.
Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching: Contexts and Concerns in Teacher Education. Yale University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1996). A Framework for the Implementation of Task-Based Instruction. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Tarone, E., & Yule, G. (1989). Focus on the Language Learner: Approaches to Identifying and Meeting the Needs of Second Language Learners. Oxford University Press.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
Underhill, A. (2005). Sound Foundations: Learning and Teaching Pronunciation. Macmillan Education.
Wilson, J. (2002). Language Teaching and Storytelling. National Centre for Language Studies.
Wright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Responses